I don't have an issue with the score, but I'm tiring of the Nintendo team at IGN and their values. They seem to be people that really enjoy the PS3 and 360, and wish for the Wii to become them. Online multiplayer would have been nice, and I don't mind them docking points off for it, but keep it consistent. There's a lot of games that could use some 4 player splitscreen multiplayer and/or local co-op and they don't get docked for not having it. Both features are of equal stature, since one can never tell which is more important to the person reading the review. Either dock for both, or don't dock for either.
Onyxmeth said:
I just noticed something. Why is the lack of features (including online multiplayer) under the Presentation score and not the Lasting Appeal score? Is there no consistency where online multiplayer should land in the scoring of titles?
Honestly the two best posts in this entire mess of a thread... why is it so hard to comprehend people disagree with the basis behind this review?
Craig bitched about this shit 2 weeks going up to the review, and then the video review was nothing but him trying to justify himself than trying to actually talk about what the game does and does well, it's a poor written review with a shaky foundation and a great score, get over it people.
MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"
Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000
