^first i want to start off by saying i havent studied everything there is to study in physics. i took two years of physics in highschool (one year was an advanced placement class, so it is supposed to be the equivalent of college physics). so as you could imagine, it was pretty basic stuff. everything i learned in those classes stemmed from principles that were proven in mathematics. so as far as i studied it, yes, i do trust all the physics i learned 100%.
you say i rejected hubbles law, but the truth is, i don't know a whole lot about it. i know what it is, but the actual mathematics behind it i have never studied, so there isnt much i can say about it. i am just skeptical towards the whole big bang theory. not to say that i reject all of this supposed 'evidence' for it, i just think there is a possibility that you could get the wrong conclusion from the data you have. the physics and chemistry i trust is the math. everything beyond that is just an educated guess.
i am finding a common trend in these 'arguments' we get in though. i question a lot of things. i can see how it comes off as im just being contrary, or ignorant, but really, i am just entertaining an idea that isnt generally accepted by the public. so basically, i dont want to say i 'rejected' those laws, because the truth is, i dont know enough about them to even do that.
also, i have no idea wtf cosmic microwave background radiation is.
Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0








