Do you believe sales are indicator of quality?

[pbroy]

ZenfoldorVGI said:

pbroy said:

ZenfoldorVGI said:

pbroy said:

gurglesletch said:
No, becasue halo 3 had bad graphix yet it still sold more than cod4 on the xbox

Graphics don't make gameplay.

Are we forgetting the PS2 had the worst graphics last gen. Yet, still sold the most software?

It had the highest quality, and I submit that said high quality of library had a small part to play in its amazing sales.

The Gamecube/Xbox ports had better graphics, but the PS2 versions sold more.

I think we're talking about two different things. Don't misunderstand me. I'm discussing the PS2 hardware. I'm saying that library quality had a small(or large) effect on sales of that hardware. Software quality between platforms can't use sales as a factor in opinionating said quality, cause the userbase and thus audience is different, and again, using sales as a factor for software is absolutely relative to other very similar software on the same platform, with the same hype levels, ect.

I should have seperated that. I was talking about 2 different things. I was refering to Halo 3 in the first part. Then about how the PS2 sold more games than the gamecube/xbox. Not exactly pertaining to quality.