Nintendo should just say "no". Frankly, they'd be better served working with Activision, Square Enix or Rockstar on something.
Gamerace said:
jarrod said:
lol, that did sound a little viral. I love Capcom, maybe I should hit Sven up for a job...
Seriously though, Capcom on Wii just isn't one of the "bad cases" imo, they're at least trying (alongside the milking anyway). I think the illwill from the Wii core community would be helped a lot of the platform got a "real" Resident Evil and a SSF4 port though.
|
Yeah, I think we agree Capcom makes a serious effort on Wii with some of there games, but then so has EA. Both have also put out crap and both tend to put their big western releases on HD over Wii (EA has no Japanese centric games) so getting back to the original point, I don't think Capcom's effort on Wii is significantly better than EAs. The only real difference is the Japan centric games getting ported.
|
I think EA has made some genuine efforts (Tiger annually, Sports Active, Boom Blox, Grand Slam Tennis) and they've largely paid off. My problem with EA is that they're emblematic of the general problem with western Wii publishers, they think there's some "secret code" to reaching that mass Wii audience, when the truth is the majority of that casual base is the same exact casual audience they were selling to on PS2. Madden, FIFA and NFS this year are signs to me that despite every step forward, EA fundamentally still just doesn't get it.
