I can see "AGGH PS3 fans are the ones who think that KZ2 looks better" (even though it does). But check this out. Why is it only the devout 360 fans, who for the longest time have been looking for a game to topple KZ2 the only ones who think MW2 looks better? Look at the "middle ground" people, PS3 fans, multiconsole owners, and they all agree MW2 doesn't look as good as KZ2.
For reminders, GTAIV got a 10 in graphics and that KZ2 scored lower AFTERWARDS. Seriously? What if IGN scored the graphics lower for MW2? Would you still be on your high horse, or just because a number has been attached to it, you're going to gloat?
Well guess what, as someone already pointed out, IGN has 3 different scores for MW2 in graphics: 10, 9.5, and 9.0. KZ2? 10, 10, and 9.5. Add those up and see which number is higher. Nobody ever said that MW2 is a poor graphics game, just that it's not up there with KZ2. YOU give it a rest
