highwaystar101 on 10 November 2009
Kasz216 said:
If he would of debated they might of lost people rather then had crushing gains. Richard Dawkins isn't the best debater. He would of went on wide unimportant tangents that would of insulted anyone who believed in anything remotley spirutal. |
I agree.
Richard Dawkins debates like me. Like a complete dickhead. We say our point in an obnoxious way and when it is not accepted we just call the opposition stupid. All it does is drive the opposition away as oppose to convince them to turn.
To be honest I have no idea why I debate like that. All it does is lead to you losing. And it is what Dawkins does. It is not a good way to debate.
