By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

I say Valve gets the picture. They stick with the dedicated community on the 360 and can make profit off of map making. MOD's are not needed for L4D on consoles, because PC piracy is already killing their profits. They still remain loyal to PC (sadly), but I guess I can't blame them. It is true as well that L4D doesn't fit the PS3 image.

lol, this is too funny. You make two assumptions that I can't begin to understand,

1. PS3 owners do not buy map pack DLC (despite PSN charts showing quite the contrary)

2. For some odd reason, L4D doesn't fit the PS3 image? Please explain that one.

1. I never said Sony owners don't buy map packs. I said the 360 is way stronger with online and has a more dedicated FPS community.

2. L4D doesn't fit the PS3 image because as much as Sony tries to force it down peoples throats there will never be a truly interesting shooter that can be a system seller on the PS3. It doesn't have that appeal. The PS3's appeal applies to third person  titles as in JRPG's, Sports, Racing and action titles. Microsoft is far stronger on the shooters, whilst they do very well in the sports, RPG's and racing for themselves,  but Sony thrives in JRPG's more so than WRPG's department. Sony needs to cut the shit and start marketing fully to the same age group they've always been focusing on which is Teens to adults. They need to stop trying to bring in the casuals  cause it isn't working and they need to stop trying to draw the FPS fans, because they aren't majorly leaving the PC or 360.