There are two choices here:
Ignorant: The journalist is an idiot incapable of checking the net to see that the latest quarterly data is not June but actually September. Any journalist writing an article on this should be expected to do more research than was apparently done if ignorance is the case. In short, this is piss poor journalism and if it is indicative of all of his work he is a bad journalist.
-OR-
Dishonest: The worst of the two options. He went with the data that made his fanboy sense tingle the most. Nothing much to say here except that this is top notch douchebaggery and makes him the lowest scum of the journalism world.
Conclusion: Either way he is not a good journalist and in the end the article doesn't effect much if anything so it isn't worth getting upset about.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
