headshot91 said:
Ok, I'm going to say this very slowly, so you can understand. Your second sentence doesn't make sense, smaller userbase sold more games? GT sold more on ps2, Ready? Ok. same with vetteman. Gt3 launched when the ps2 userbase was smaller than the ps3's. Of course that is correct. It is a fact. However, over the next 4 years the ps2 sold an additional 120 million consoles. The ps3 has sold less than a quarter of this. GT3 and GT4 had good legs because of the ps2s huge userbase.Getting back to the minimum GT5 sales, which this debate is all about, I said a minimum of 8 million is ludicrous, yet many people think otherwise? That is where you are not getting it. I am saying GT5 will sell less than GT3/GT4. YOU see? |
He meant smaller starting userbase, so yes it makes perfect sense. I'll only explain once, since you dont seem to understand userbases. When GT3 launched it only had 11M, the PS2 then went on to sell and additional 75M consoles in the next 4 years. Now the PS3 will probably be at about 31-33M consoles when GT5 launches. That would mean that to meet the same requirements GT3 had, it would only have to sell another 52M conoles over the next 4 years. Now it probably wont sell that many consoles, but no one here is saying that GT5 will sell as much as GT3 did, which sold 15M. Most people are saying 8-10M. To think that isnt a possibilty when it will have triple the starting userbase and the ps3 will have to average 13M consoles a year over the next 4 years, is completely ridiculous. Also, since there was a another Gran Turismo game that launched 3.5 years later, I dont know how you can argue that GT3 was selling to the entire 130+M userbase.
Also on what planet is 8M higher than 15M or even 10M? Since that is what would make it a PS2 GT beater according to you.