| DMeisterJ said: @ Soriku Nice troll... And doesn't make sense. You don't need to buy anything different for the different PS3 versions. They lose features. What is the point of your post? Why is it that on every post, you take a shot at Sony? |
I'd say that there is a basis for comparison between a DS that won't play GBA games and a PS3 that won't play PS2 games.
Though I'd certainly agree that a one-liner isn't really making any kind of comparison.
The crucial difference is that Sony is trying to broaden the appeal of a relatively unsuccessful product with a redesign that removes backwards compatibility. It's a risk, but Sony has more to gain than it has to lose. Since the DS isn't unsuccessful, it has more to lose than it has to gain, and shouldn't fix what isn't broken.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
