Soundwave said:
Not really. Nintendo can go to another vendor and get a drive for a cheaper price because it is essentially a DVD drive. I think actually the truth is it's a vocal minority (yes, minority) of Nintendo fans that get caught up in all this nonsense to begin with. HD and Blu-Ray aren't the "enemy" anymore than optical discs were evil just because Howard Lincoln said so in 1996, or that online play is bad like Nintendo tried to sell during the GameCube era. Higher definition graphics with increased horsepower can create better game experiences. Period. Would you want to play Super Mario Galaxy at half the resolution on the N64 instead of the Wii? Of course not. Even with a pointer controller, no one would want to play that version over the Wii version. The downgrade in visual fidelity would cause the game to lose a lot of its visual charm which is part of the enjoyment. One day (and probably relatively soon) Nintendo will release a higher end console with HD, and you will not miss your existing Wii for anything other than nostalgia, I'd gauruntee it pretty much 100%. |
More opinion myopia about tech. And strawman arguments (not going HD does not mean reverting to original Gameboy resolution).
You're assuming HD comes with no drawbacks. They increase cost. Even when Nintendo ups their systems they will make sure it's in a way that cuts down on development, for both them and the developers (which is one trend they have been consistent with after the N64 lost them third parties). If blu-ray can facilitate that, only then would they include it.
And assuming I'm against this because I somehow think they are the "enemy" shows you don't really read my posts.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








