ph4nt said:
The NES released for $200 in the 80s. Which is worth a bit more now. A $200 system in the 80s was state of the art, a $200 system now is "budget". The Wii would have been $200 most likely if Wii Sports didn't come with it so I don't consider Wii breaking the trend. Nintendo can't keep their console price at $200 in the future due to inflation, a $300 price tag allows them to pack more into the box and make it more appealing, plus it will eventually reach the $200 point in 2-3 years (depending on success). The amount of people who bought 360s and PS3s at $400+ shows that even a price that high isn't too much (though $600 was). Ps2 sold incredibly well at $300, people are willing to pay $300 and by the time the next system releases, the recession will probably heading out the door and people will have morem oney to throw around. Nintendo will price the system that they feel the market will be comfortable with, and they will design their system specifications around that prie point, I think $300 is the perfect price for next generation. |
Tech from the past doesn't count, since ALL tech prices go down. It's about the specs for that cost at the moment, not the 80s.
And you can't use the HD consoles for this, when Nintendo was about NOT copying those models.
It's not about what you think is perfect. It's about what's reasonable for them. And one thing you aren't taking into account is the recession, which might end soon, but isn't likely to turn into a boom after that.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








