Rath said:
I don't see what is wrong with the first two answers really. The idea that a particle has a probability of being in any position is fairly fundamental to quantum physics - it allows for quantum tunnelling and explains the double slit experiment results. All of the evidence appears to point towards randomness existing. |
I dunno what to say.
I could say one thing. The probability of of being in any position, as we curently understand or perceive it, could be flawed since we can't detect the 5th dimensions (and 6th). So the particle 'appears' like it's in a specific position. You know how they say that an electron is actually at many places at the same time, but it's 'more' on some places than others? It's got to do with how we perceive the 3 space dimensions and time. But if we knew how the 5th dimension and beyond where constructed, it wouldnt appear probabilistic/random any more.







