I can't understand how a thread about the metacritic score can turn into mario galaxy has to do halo 3 numbers. and then talking about it being cheaper than halo3 (by 10 bucks) and conveniently forgeting that Halo3 costs t much more than smg to make. I guess some people just can't resist.
On topic, it really is strange. I mean normally when the game comes out, the "bad reviews" get published, but that seems not to affect SMG. For example I have a feeling that Mass effect will not get that high scores since not that many sites have reviewed it.
I think someone said that according to an agreement with the publishers or something sites don't put there "bad review" up until after release. Has anybody else heard about such a thing.
Thats why it is strange that Mario is getting better reviews.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
