fkusumot on 14 November 2007
| ckmlb said: The burden of proof is not on me to prove that it's a coincidence, but on those claiming otherwise to prove that it is not coincidental. Games on a system come in a multitude of different levels of quality (everything from Mario to Chickenshoot) so by default that means aggregates are too broad not be coincidental unless there is an active intent to bring down the scores in which case it's up to 1up bias proclaimers to prove not me. |
Well, there's always cognitive bias. I feel it would be hard to prove that the aggregate review scores of some sites are not statically biased. After that you have to look for a pattern that is found in other evidence. Apparently after intensive review you have found that there is no evidence. What was your method of inquiry?
