dahuman said:
that's you, you might be lucky to have only one(in reality, even ONE is NOT OK!) there are far less issues with older PS3 models breaking down vs older 360 models breaking down, those are simple facts. just because they paid for the warranty, it doesn't make it OK, it's not suppose to break that fast to start with, you need to get that into your head and not use that as a counter argument because it's basically saying that a guy can just come over and fk you in the a-ho then put some lotions on it to let it cure and then you will just forget about it, no dood, no, you are not supposed to get screwed in the a-ho to start with! |
Sorry man, but as you said one break isn't even ok, so the 40 and 80GB PS3's count as well. I don't care about one break. If one breaks, I have another system to play and I get the other one fixed. Thats just me. Microsoft has a three year warranty for broken products....does Sony? When I got my PS3 I was more pissed at Sony for not giving me the choice of compsite and HD cables like Microsoft did more than freaking RROD. Wanna know why? I expected RROD because I have one of the older systems. Now I know how to take care of my 360 once I got it fixed at Play N Trade. In Japan those who have working consoles are getting shafted and thats that. 360 owners who give a damn about the franchises got screwed and thats that. Sony has a right to protect the quality of ported timed-exclusives on their system, but still they never paid. Microsoft deserves at least equal to what they recieved in the long run. As I said before, I am buying all these games on the PS3 anyway, but it doesn't change the fact that it is morally wrong.







