puffy said:
The problem I see is that the 10-year lifespan doesn’t mean the PS3 is going to be the leading format for that long, with Sony sure to release a new console well before the 10 years is up, in the same way it released the PS3 well ahead of the time the PS2 is expected to die a death. Sony, and Hirai may not see the current sales trend as a problem, but unless last month’s figures carry on, and help build a momentum, it could be that the PS3 universally fails to get anywhere close to the sort of success Sony had with the PS2. And that would spell disaster for a console which needs to sell in large numbers for the company to see any kind of profit.
What did I misread exactly? Here they reference the PS2, meaning that the are thinking along the same lines with the PS3. |
The whole thing. Did their comments mean the 10 years is merely how long they plan to sell the PS3, or wait 10 years for the PS4, regardless of how long the PS3 sells?
Is it the former or the latter?
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








