Khuutra said:
Reductio ad absurdum arguments only work when you are taking the entirety of a statement into consideration. My original point is that stories can fill out different niches according to different intents and still be excellent undner a given set of criteria. Let's ignore, for the moment, that there's no such thing as an objective standard of quality when it comes to the arts, and absolute statements of quality have to be taken as intrinsically absurd, following that. We can ignore that, right? I hope so, because we have been so far! All right, let's take an example here... Hell, let's use Dragon Ball. Dragon Ball is a series made primarily for kids, taken as a (very) loose adaptation of The JOurney to the West. On the other hand, let's take another good TV show... we'll say The Wire. Is Dragon Ball as good as The Wire? Probably not. But it is a much better children's show. The same logic can be used for stories in almost any medium. Gears of War may not have a grand and meaningful narrative but it's a damn good romp about shooting things and also blowing things up. |
WHOA HEY WHOA WHOA HEY!
Don't utter The Wire in the same setence as that other one. DBZ being the one. My brother who would qualify as a kid would disagree with the statement as well. He absolutely loved The Wire once he got used to the accent.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








