what if CALL OF DUTY MODERN WARFARE 2.....???

[NKAJ]

ironman said:

huaxiong90 said:

ironman said:

huaxiong90 said:

ironman said:

Smashed said:

PS3 would rock em.
I stand by my theory.
360 has more players and good gamers, PS3 has less gamers but better gamers.

And controllers have really nothing to do with anything. If ANYTHING the PS3's controller is more accessible, and possibly easier to use than a 360 controller. But really, doesn't matter, controllers =/= skill.

Yes, and this is why the PS3 won the battle to see who could get 43 million kills first in Battlefield 1943...Oh wait, they didn't!

My bet is on the 360, A lot of hardcore FPS players and a controller that is better suited for FPS meaning that people with both a PS3 and 360 are likely to choose the 360 to play the game on.

Higher amount of players =/= skill.

and....exactly who said it does??? More players does = more kills, no doubt about it.

Red part tells me that you said it. If not, my bad then.

Yea, it says that Xbox live players got to the kill limit first, not that they had a better K/D spread.

@Pharaoh That's because it is relevant, Battlefield 1943 is the only game I know of that did any kind of a competition between the two consoles, if you don't like it then please bring up another kind of competition between the two console games that would work for a FPS. The way Battlefield did it is probably the way COD would do it.

 

Edit: see my post below!

did they rever realse the download numbers of battlefiled 1943 from both ps3 and 360?