Good riddance to everyone who does "core game tests."

[SnowFlow]

kingofwale said:

miz1q2w3e said:
I don't like that "test" stuff either, if developers didn't want to take a risk in making a Wii game then they should have made their game GOOD, not a mediocre "test", as if that was any indication of what people want. If a game was good and appealing it would get people interested.

for me personally, even if Dead Space Extraction got awsome reviews i still wouldn't want it, it's an unappealing game to (and many others by the looks of those sales). also, i tend to lose intrest in a game that's been marked as a test game.

I do agree that test games deserve bad sales, but i don't agree that developers deserve to shut down, many hardworking people would lose their jobs that way and they didn't have much of a say on what to create as their game.

but yeah, test games suck!

so, let me get this straight... the game isn't "good", not due to review, but due to the fact it was marked as an 'test" game?

 

What about those un-'test' games who also recieved good reviews? NHM, Zak and Wiki? Do they also deserve bad sales?

Rail shooters suk, sales dont' lie, if this game would of been third person like the first Dead Sapce it would of sold much better.  A 5 hour game with no replay value that is exactly the same each time through is not worth $50, how Extraction got good reviews is mind boggling imo.  No More Heroes was a heavily flawed game that scored much higher than it deserved, I bought the game and hated it, possibly the worst graphics I have seen in person on Wii, worse than Maddeon 07 and 08.  Zak and Wiki is a very niche game and sold well for what it was.  The only mature or core games Wii is getting from thirs party devs are weak as hell.  RE:4 and Monster Hunter 3 are probably the best efforts thus far imo.