KingArthur said:
Feeling fatter? Absolutely not. :) I can only comment about the hockey part of that table. We have roughly 60 players on our team/reservers. 2 of us have body fat percentage 9 or less. 9 of us have bf% higher than 15%. Those are measured when we start our training after summer so those results are a bit high. So that table looks ok for hockey players. Anyhow, the table shows that ideal body fat percentage for non-athletes is 9-15%. Do you really think that 20% would be unhealthy?
|
The key thing you mentioned was that the body fat stats were taken pre-season, which is the equivalent of weighing in after a summer vacation; almost everyone, barring the freakishly trim or those with compulsive gym work ethics aren't going to start training anywhere near peak condition (probably those 2 lean guys).
9-15% seems a bit low for non-athletes, but I'm thinking I'd just LIKE to believe that so that I could be content at around 16% when not actively training. I'm not content at 16% though; I know for a fact I should drop about 5lbs of fat to be in competitive condition which would put me closer to 12% or less. And that would be before the build up immediately leading up to a sanctioned bout.
The reason that probably seems low is because averages have Americans as being a fair degree higher than those numbers. But really all that means is that the average American has a higher percentage of body fat than they need or should have.
Tanita (who manufactures body fat/water percentage scales) suggests anything past 20% for men is past "healthy." The average for normal, non-athletes is supposedly closer to 22% for men (7-10% over).







