Resistance played like an average shooter to me. The graphics were terrible, but forgivable being it was released so early in the PS3s life. The weapons were fun, but I really felt the naration was detrimental as it just interupted the game. Early levels were crap but it picked up later, and as many have mentioned, co-op was great fun.
Resistance 2 was better simply for the 8-player co-op for me. The campaign in 2 also had more 'epic' moments but it was still lacking something. I actually enjoyed the campaign more than the first (excluding the cheap invisible enemies). I would have prefered being able to carry more than 1 weapon though. And multiplayer, the sequel is just plain better. Similar gameplay but with more people, and just a generally larger scale.
If it came down to it, there are other shooters I prefer to both Resistance games. CoD4 has a more intense campaign with some really amazing set piece moments, and has a better multiplayer, and HL2 & Killzone 2 campaigns are better than either of the campaigns in the Resistance games imo.
Basically, I disagree :P
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
