tarheel91 on 09 November 2007
| Lost tears of Kain said: I first off never dissed maro galaxy, only defended bioshock and the wii fans go wild, this is unbelievable. """"""Might want to rethink that one. Plus, you forgot that Galaxy makes this little thing called gravity really important and that instantly disqualifies it as a remake. """" You understand that all the games have perks added to them that change the gameplay, it still is a sequal, you collect stars, hit people people and jump on them to kill them, still the same enemie, but cause its got gravity its not a remake. No matter what i say its still a fantastic game and feels great but its still in a huge way its mario 64 with few added perks Naz """First of all Lost Tears of Kain, if you haven't played both games, you don't want to get into this discussion with me. Bioshock only has better gameplay than System Shock 2 if you were too stupid to figure out how to use the awesome RPG elements of System Shock 2. """My problem with Bioshock is that reviews recognized it as original. No reviews are claiming Super Mario Galaxy is original, because it's not. It's just a re-imagining of Mario. Bioshock on the other hand got credit for numerous innovations which were literally just copy-pasted from its predecessor. If the reviews had said "System Shock 2 was great and so is this because it's like SS2" then I wouldn't be complaining about it. Also, I never said my opinion was fact. I specifically said some review scores bothered ME. I didn't say no one had a right to like these games or disagree with my opinions on them.""" You really dont have to be an asswhole about it, i defended bioshock without swearing at you, only stating your opinion is NOT fact. You confirm this by your assanine first comment. Even if i HAD played it, which i havent, that doesnt mean just cause you see System shock 2 as better, doesnt mean IT IS. Ive heard people say they like the combat in bioshock more, its opinon, not just your own. You say its just like its predessor and is getting claimed for innovation. I hear the same thing for galaxy. Its supposedly been so long since a platformer that it feels so danm new, therefor it is new and will get rated higher. Even if they had mentioned it as SS 2 successor, doesnt mean it would of changed its score. Again, you leave no compensation for other peoples opinions, calling them stupid if they dont agree with you. Thats making your opinion FACT. That and you said COD was 5-6 hours my ass. Ive exceeded that, so yes they were right, just because you did it doesnt mean its not true. |
The "might want to rethink that" part was referring to you saying they were the exact same when the gameplay was superior in one and worse in the other. Obviously, they can't be equals. Calling gravity an "added perk" is like calling ice an added perk to hockey. I mean, it's really just field hockey with that "added perk." My point is, calling the gravity part of SMG and "added perk" belittles its value and makes it seem like much more of a gimick and much less of the gameplay changing concept that most reviews are describing it as.
(My fingers are cramping from making all those quotation mark gestures.)
