CGI-Quality said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
CGI-Quality said:
Mirson said:
tedsteriscool said:
This will be lower than most scores, so EyePet is a good game confirmed? |
Or it could be an average one. By reading the review, this is what I gathered:
- Sluggish loading times
- Vague directions/explanations for challenges. The reviewer had a difficult time beating challenges because of the lack of explanation. The game didn't tell him what he was doing wrong or how he needed to do it. If he's having problems with the challenges, imagine how a 7 year old will struggle with the game.
- Game gets repetitive after a while.
- There aren't many tricks your eyepet can learn, so "you're mostly doing stuff for the sake of doing stuff."
- Doing the tricks or playing the game is impressive in the first few days, but it's questionable after that. The game does look like it'll lose its charm pretty fast.
- Disappointing online functuality. No social interaction and not being able to send pictures or videos while in the game (other games can).
Score well justified.
|
You've played it?
|
Yea mirson HAVE YOU??!?
People that played and reviewed the game are the only people that can justify their score....oohh wait...thats what eurogamer EXACTLY did.
|
Eurogamer isn't who I questioned though....
That's like me saying the score of Halo 3: ODST of 6/10 was justified because "X" website played it and said it was nothing more than an expansion pack. So in essence, how can he say it's justified if he's yet to play it? Basically, whether you think it or not, my question to Mirson is reasonable.
|
Him playing it has nothing to do with weather or not the score is justified (I have no idea why you even asked if he had played it ?)
Eurogamer gave a 6/10 with many reasons as to why it was and mirson thought they justified their score.......there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
