CGI-Quality said:
atma998 said:
CGI-Quality said:
atma998 said:
CGI-Quality said:
atma998 said:
CGI-Quality said:
He's awful quiet all of a sudden............ |
No, you see I have a social life. I don't spend my entire life in front of my computer. Back on topic, I really don't know what you're trying to prove with your top 20 best selling non-bundled games. Again it's almost entirely dominated by Nintendo and GTA is still > than GT. You failed. Sorry.
|
And nobody else does?
And how did I fail, you said: "No. The ones where the whole top 10 is owned by Nintendo. The ones where Nintendo owns 18 spots of the top 20 and will own the whole top 20 really soon. This one. The only Sony game in the top 20 is guess what... GTA:SA at 18.04 million!"
Who "FAILS" again? Right............
|
And why would we remove the bundled games again? Indeed you failed.
|
No, I didn't. Your post was inaccurate and claimed the only Sony game in the Top 20 was GTA: SA, when indeed, not only is GTA:SA NOT a Sony game, but TWO GT games are in the Top 20.
Again, it is YOU who failed, but you should know this by now. It's unfortunate you're so overcome with extreme bias....
I don't get why you frequent Sony threads, I really don't.
|
You didnt answer. My previous post was totally accurate, Nintendo is owning the whole top 20 and own 18 spots on the top 20 (and soon the entire top 20) best selling game. I really don't get why would we put away the bundled games unless you're a extremely Sony biased person....oh wait!
|
* facepalm *
A. Please don't talk about bias, I'd be far-fetched to find anything that wasn't troublesome, negative, or one-sided from you.
B. You said there are NO Sony games in the Top 20, except GTA:SA. 1. It's NOT a Sony game. 2. If you read the list, the games you claim are so bundled were NOT bundled at launch, which is why they count and Wii Sports does not.
C. Why are you in a thread about Sony in the first place? EVERYBODY knows you aren't here to be constructive.
This is basically how it is arguing with you, you'll never admit to being wrong and are as one-sided as they get...
|
LMAO.
Did you ever admit that you were wrong in the first place???? Sorry you're trying to prove that you're better when it's clearly not the case. The difference is that I'm using solid arguments while you're not. You evaded all my points and threw up some BS like your non-bundled list. Come on... I mean this is SO biased. I'm just using VGC data.
