The vgchartz ranking game--Halo 3

[hsrob]

Slimebeast said:

hsrob said:

Slimebeast said:

I just wanted to highlight that it's all fanboyism everywhere, sometimes open, sometimes in disguise.

Maybe stealth trolling is too strong of a word to describe it. And I never did. But still im trying to prove a point.

It can't be a coincidence that all the Sony biased members so far have given 8s?

KylieDog 8.0
CGI 8.5
FameMcSwagg 8.0
Aldro 8.0
Carl 8.9
Rick 8.2
Boutros 8.3
SciFiBoy 8.2
---------
Eight votes, Sony fan average = 8.27

If you believe there's no bias hidden in this, I think you're a very naive person.

I don't see how scores in the 8's can be considered evidence trolling or fanboyism.  The scores may be influenced by such but there is no way to prove it and in the end you end up standing there pointing accusingly at other members with no evidence to back you up.

Mario Galaxy was given and three and several 6's and 7's and they were counted, so I don't the point of pointing fingers at members who are entitled to give their opinion about the game.

OT: Haven't played so can't score it.

I didnt point out any individual, i pointed at the collective and I proved it through very solid statistics.

Well no, you name individual names, whether you stuck them in a group or named them one by one is irrelevant.

Furthermore, as someone pointed out already, Scifiboy i think, you misquoted his score and several other people in the group have refuted their position as Sony fans.  Solid statistics would involve getting the scores of all people in this thread who identify as Sony fans, not just the lowest ones you could lay your hands on. 

All that and your conclusion is based on the determination that a score below 9, is somehow invalid or must be influenced by fanboyism. Carl gave the game an 8.9(89), 5 marks below the Halo 3 meta of 94.  Similiary should we question the opinion of all those that gave a >9.9 or a >99%, because they are equidistant from the score that Halo 3 'deserves'.

People are entitled to their opinion.  You can question their opinion but you can't apply statistics to show that their opinion is somehow less valid. 

I can understand it's frustrating when someone can't see the quality in a game that you love or even people giving low scores to games that they have barely played but so far in all previous iterations of this thread, all scores have been included unless you could prove that the person hadn't played the game.