sorc,
He does mention it, but my original idea is slightly different because of the subtlety in tone.
His statement of it still growing is only a footnote within the total idea that the market would have seen a lot less expansion. His idea is geared towards the industry not being in as good a shape without the wii.
My thought is geared more towards the idea that the industry would be fine without the wii.
The tone is different. From my standpoint, it would be a good reason to say, "the wii wasn't necessary", whereas from the OP's standpoint it is a good lead-in to saying, "the wii is necessary".









