By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

@Chairman-Mao: I do agree that the OP was pointless (as in "white horse has white colour").

Don't you think you contradict yourself by saying at the same time that they've been making sequels to their classics and forgot their core audience? If Nintendo didn't do the sequels, then they had forgot the core audience.

Sony is making new IP:s for the sole reason that they don't have core IP:s. With Uncharted 2, Resistance 2, Motorstorm sequel, GT5, R&C, they obviously are forgetting their core audience.

M$ isn't in the industry for gamers, but because to protect the operating system business from being disrupted by livingroom multimedia devices, such as PS3. After all, Ken Kutaragi said 15 years ago that he's going to destroy M$, which definately would have eventually happened if nobody had interrupted Sony (in this case, M$ and Nintendo did it).

M$ also didn't make any gamers happier with the warranty extension, what they did was that they tried to fix something that made gamers very unhappy, which was the faulty hardware.

How is women and older people casual audience? As far as i know, they play like other people just aswell, if there are games they like to play. I'd like to know the logic behind your assertion.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.