| CommunistHater said: Evolution is annoying when people use it as their reason to be anti-christian. Belief in a theory that proposes thousands of new questions does not make you superior. SCIENCE NOW KNOWS THAT MANY OF THE PILLARS OF DARWINIAN THEORY ARE EITHER FALSE OR MISLEADING. YET BIOLOGY TEXTS CONTINUE TO PRESENT THEM AS FACTUAL EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION. WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY ABOUT THEIR MOTIVES? |
You either didn't take science at school or chose not to listen because if you did you would understand that science changes its stance farely regularly to conform with the facts. Yeah there were discrepancies in Darwins' theory of evolution, nobody worth his salt will deny that, you can't get something like evolution 100% right first time. Darwin was very open about the errors in his theory, if you've ever read his book there is even a chapter explaining the flaws. But at the end of it he also asks future generations of scientists to explore these flaws in his theory and since then that is what we have been doing.
I'm not going to pretend there are still discrepancies in the theory, because there are. What I am going to say is that the vast majority of those flaws found in the theory of evolution have now been solved and the theory has been adapted to suit the new evidence. It is at the point now where it can't be denied any longer, the evidence is more than sufficient to prove evolution occurs, we're just ironing out the creases.
Have a look at any other theory and you will see the exact same story. No-one is trying to hide the flaws, in fact it is the opposite. Scientists are very open about them because they want to solve flaws to better understand the theory. This applies to every theory, it is more or less the definition of scientific theory.
Using the "Darwin was wrong" argument is a case of an extremely flawed understanding of science i'm afraid.
