Darc Requiem said:
outlawauron said:
Darc Requiem said:
reaver_x said:
cura said:
hm, I can't help but wish all the JRPGs that released on 360 that are now coming to ps3 to fail.
Really, what was the point of not making these games with a simultaneous release? |
because MS payed these guys a lot for the timed exclusive rights. And regarding the Last Remnant, i really could care less. That game was one of the worst RPG's i have ever played and no amount of fixing and extra content is gonna change that. Besides we have a ton of other RPG's comming next year that are more than worth my time and money
|
Proof? You do realize that the only time a UE3 engine game has hit the PS3 first is when Sony secured exclusive rights to UT3 right. Developers seem to struggle with their first UE3 game particularly on PS3. There have a been few titles that were announced first for PS3 but released first on the 360. Stranglehold and Fatal Inertia are two examples.
|
Because problems with the UE3 delayed the PC version too? 
|
That would be funny if the PC version wasn't announced over a year after the 360/PS3 version. The 360/PS3 version was announced on May 10th of 2007. The PC version was announced on July 14, 2008. Coincedently July 14, 2008 was the day SE announced the released date for the 360 version.
360/PS3 Announcement
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3159373
PC Announcement
http://pc.ign.com/articles/888/888971p1.html
|
But a PC version (which is always the lead) doesn't receive a few month delay because the 360 version is finished. (Which we know isn't true, because the 360 version was an unfinished product)
