| LordTheNightKnight said: I wasn't responding to that. See the bolded part. And it isn't the graphics dicussion that's the problem. It's the ingnorance of how detail had to be sacrificed to accomodate 4 players, even more than Little Big Planet (since the action is more frentic, once you see the videos). |
The ignorance of how detail had to be sacrificed? Because you oppose to that "ignorance" your knowledge about the memory occupation, framerates and other technical specs of this engine versus the ones of Muramasa, Odin's Sphere or even Wario?
You don't know anything about that. You have no technical details and no official statments. You speculated, entrenching into a defensive position from the get go.
As far as we know it could not have anything to do with technicalities and be a pure art style direction choice that people seeing the video are in full right of not finding awesome, without showing any "ignorance" greater than yours in doing so.
You would prefer talking about the gameplay details? By all means do so, you'll probably do a better service to the ongoing thread than trying to defend the statement that this is the best 2-D graphics ever or the best possible graphics.
PS: the comparison with LBP is silly, that's why nobody did it and they stuck with comparisons with PS2 and Wii 2-D games. As to what action is more frantic: do you own a PS3 and LBP? Because there are levels where dozens to hundreds of physics-controlled objects tumble and explode and move on springs, all while 4 players interact with them. Of course the CPU power involved is an entirely different scale: again, any comparison is silly.
