| MontanaHatchet said: I think the main fail about Harry Potter is that you missed a bunch of acclaimed 360 titles like Call of Duty 2, Oblivion, Dead or Alive 4, etc., and then you managed to come up with Harry Potter? Sorry, I just found that a bit odd... |
I will admit that I forgot about Oblivion (though that game is only good on the PC in my humble opinion--and I do have the PC and 360 versions) but I lump things like DoA4 in with mediocre games like Harry Potter. Every system has a list of games that aren't super stars or people automatically discount because they're generic FPS, it's made by EA, it's mini games, it's short, it looks like crap, the list goes on, but my main point is if people would actually realize that just because a game isn't an 8.5+ game it isn't automatically bad.
I guarantee you that the majority that come on message boards and bitch that they are disappointed in x system haven't bothered trying any of the games except the big titles like MP3 and Zelda and maybe they've touched one or two of the minor ones like Godfather or Scarface. Because they've played such a wide variety of games for their system (SARCASM) they automatically think they are some kind of authority and think they made some mistake buying the system. They could have in fact made a mistake as the system isn't for them, but I just hate people that bitch about there being no games when they've only tried a small handful of the biggest titles.
