darthdevidem01 on 28 September 2009
| geddesmond2 said: Well I've no problems with people rating games with how they see it but when they take points off for stupid things then I'm like WTF. Yeah fair enough, you's didn't like the story compared to the other 3. Very understandable. But why didn't yous say that in your original post. Theres not enough gameplay and online lags. @mirsen. Someone said you posted bad things about the PS3 a few months back. So I checked your post's from around the time MGS4 released and you sure have changed your tune about the game. Sometimes first impressions speak loader than anything else. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=860182 I especially love this post here mirson because this just contradicts a lot of what you said about the game recently. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=867568 @ Kyliedog, I went and checked your posts around the time of MGS4 aswel and what can I say. Thats your genuine opinion but why didn't you mention some of the things your wrote about in the following post. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=893079 Rating a game down because it's 2 hours long is dumb. You've got RE5 as your sig. I thing that game deserves a 9.5/10. I would never dream of taking points off that game because I finished it in 1h 54 minutes on my own with dumb AI which is were that half a point was lost and when you look at the leaderboards of RE5. People finished that in 1 h with a human Co-op partner |
THIS is why I said mirson's vote shouldn't be allowed
He went COMPLETELY crazy mad over PS3 some 3 months ago.....hated it....made hate threads
& then suddenly began to hate MGS4
double standards imho
