Avinash_Tyagi said:
Entroper said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
Lord N said:
From Capcom: The Wii gets RE4: UC, the PS3 and 360 get RE5 and DMC4 From Square: The Wii gets FF: Crystal Chronicles, the PS3 gets FFXIII From Konami: The Wii gets Elebits, the PS3 gets MGS4 From Ubisoft: The Wii gets Prince Of Persia: Rival Swords(a remake of a game that everyone has already bought), the PS3 and 360 get Assassin's Creed, Rainbow Six: Vegas, And GRAW 2 From Rockstar: The Wii gets Manhunt 2, the PS3 and 360 gets GTAIV I could go on and on, but I think you see where this is going. The PS3 and 360 will have the bigger titles regardless of the Wii's install base because they simply aren't possible with the latter. |
So all you want is sequels and rehashes? |
To be fair, sequels are better than remakes of the same games (a la RE4 and PoP). There is a point to this, that established third-party franchises are putting their big titles on 360 and PS3. But I would rather see new IP or games that are actually meaningfully different because of what the Wii brings to the table than those games. Plus, Wii owners aren't as dependent on third-parties to carry the weight: From Nintendo: Mario Galaxy, Zelda: TP, Super Paper Mario, Super Smash Bros. Brawl From Retro: Metroid Prime 3 |
The remakes are due to devs trying to capitalize on Wii's success, they were caught off guard, but the PS3 was expected to be a success, yet instead of new IPs all it gets are sequels and rehashes |
more or less there is much less dev time and it enables them to get games out FAST! It takes over a year for new Ips to be made from scratch.