dbot on 24 September 2009
Demotruk said:
You see no problem adding an imaginary 59.98 that nobody will have to pay to your calculation?
If you want to include the initial remote+nunchuck, you'd have to include the consoles in the comparison, which wouldn't favour the PS3 (which is more expensive and doesn't include a wand or camera). |
Regardless, $279 is still a substantial cost and more than the system itself which were the initial points. My apologies, by all means remove $60 from the Wii cost. That makes a HUGE difference. /sarc
Thanks for the input, Jeff.
