By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
joora on 23 September 2009
Edit Thread
cgkc17 said:
joora said:
Blacksaber said:
Still doesn't change the 3/10 Gamecritics gave it...

 

Well, Gamecritics invested a whole 3.5 hrs playing it before reviewing it:

Disclosures: This game was obtained via publisher and reviewed on the Wii. Approximately 3.5 hours of play were devoted to the single-player mode, and the game was not completed. There are no multiplayer modes.

http://www.gamecritics.com/brad-gallaway/muramasa-the-demon-blade-review

 

That says all about their professional level.

 

 

im not defending their score or anything, but i don't think a reviewer should have to complete a game before they review it. by 3-4 hours into a game, you should be getting the jist of it. if its bad for the first 3.5 hours, chances are it'll be just as bad the rest of the game. lifes too short to force yourself to force yourself to finish a bad game, especially when there are sooo many more quality games out there.

again, not a dig at the game at all, i havn't even played it yet.

 

Well, in this particular case the review score is by far the lowest score listed on metacritic. Considering the metacritics rating of 80, 30 simply should mean that either the reviewer isn't objective (or better said highly subjective) or he didn't do his job right. Or both.

 

 



.