Xxain said:
maykissthebride said:
masschamber said:
thekitchensink said:
First of all, I'm appalled that people think a 7/10 'sucks'.
Second, have you read our review of TMNT? |
Didn't you get the memo, any game below 90 is FFF quality, anything above AAA, anything landing exactly on 90 will have it's qualtiy decided by a rock paper scisors contest, best 2 out of 3 wins
|
As i said before (and i really expected you to have read it), that depends.
Take an innovative 7.0 game. You play it because it have something new and cool. Even if the implementation turns out to be a little buggy or repetitive, you still have some fun out of the new stuff.
But when you have an OLD game, released as new, like spyborgs, and all it gets is a 7.0, you have no reason to pick it up.
Are you willing to spend 50 bucks on a brawler with nothing new on it?
Man, if the game had at least motion plus support, i could maybe buy it. But a 50 bucks button masher? Dont we have streets of rage already on the VC?
|
im sorry dude...but thats a terrible outlook...just because a game isnt innovative doesnt mean its not worth playing...so I guess you dont play Shooters,JRPG's or action games? |
Only if they´re really, really great
Cmon, im playing videogames for 15 years now.
You probably played a lot of games through your life too.
Dont you feel a little bit tired of the same old stuff?
I can see how an old concept can still be GREAT fun. Im playing Dead Space on the PC right now, and the game works a lot like Resident Evil 4. But im LOVING IT. Because it is amazing, even if the game play feels just like RE4 (and a lot of other games i didnt played yet)
The problem is the "regular hardcore game" isnt selling on wii.
Or, at least is what ALL publishers say.
When they have the chance to try something new.... they do the same stuff all over again.
And again, dont sell as expected, start to cry, say the wii is doomed, yadda yadda yadda.
