By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
XlPackratlX on 18 September 2009
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
XlPackratlX said:
CGI-Quality said:
XlPackratlX said:

Hey, that's a nice arguement you made there after like, what, a hundred people?

 

Now, I play xbox live alot and enjoyed it for the past six years and loved the content it's been givin' out.  And I do enjoy reading articles from guys like these who just write about Microsoft's inhumane corporate skanks.  That's fine.

 

However, if you truly believe Microsoft's Xbox Live is a fraud, then why not go get a lawyer...AND SUE THE BASTARDS!!!!111!!!*  Seriously...  I mean, Jesus Christ, you people complain so much that Microsoft is ripping you off, yet Xbox Live is getting even more popular without even knowing it.  You just only sit on your chair with your computer and whine and complain; I'm clearly not.  I mean, how come this seem to be big deal.  And I hate this arguement, "The PSN is free afterall, isn't it."  So what?!  What gain will Sony get for a free online service?

 

"I wanted to lay out my case that Microsoft is clearly over charging for Live and that some of the downloadable content is nothing more then a money grab."

 

Well, it looks like you already did.  Now, send an invitation to Microsoft for a court meeting.  I would really love to see any justification from both sides.

 

Come on: you have the evidence, change the world, make shitload 'a money, and have fun.  *dipshit*

Sounds to me like you need to speak with the article creator, not VG Chartz or the thread creator...

The OP has a link, start there

Come on...Anybody can make these arguements.

And article creator?    Seriously?    It's a blog.  They're not that reliable.

Who said anything about reliablity? Doesn't matter if it's a blogger, I'm stating that your post seems generated towards the topic creator (on VG CHARTZ), not the original author of this article. That's where you need to vent out that the article isn't to your liking. The topic creator is just the messenger, not the author.

In fact, to my understanding, the topic creator favors the 360. Why would he post a thread like this to generate controversy towards the system he prefers? He posted it to show how ridiculous it appears, a description I agree with. I, at the same time, know where to vent my frustration about it, and that's not with the topic creator on VG Chartz...

And I am merely saying the author, whoever wrote this article (this topic creator should've been more careful on how to post this article on this forum; like give out a personal introduction, or something.  Why hasn't the topic creator said anything in the first post?), complains about Microsoft making more money than Sony and has done nothing about it.  Yet more and more people are paying for it and seemed to have no problems at all, including myself.

And about reliability: blogs are just not (...and forget I said that.  It was something I learned, don't ask).  Maybe unless you pasted a novel-length, detailed post on your blog, they may count.  But I have seen these arguements before.  This is not something new, I'll say.

Now, when I commented on my 2nd post, I did not blame the thread creator, monlosez, for this article.  I did realize that the thread creator did not make this article.  But he/she didn't say anything and could've be the guilty one.  You have to try to convince more people that's it's not monlosez.

Now don't mind the VG Chartz or the thread creator, I am sure you understood the false logic behind the original article.