darthdevidem01 said:
yeah ofcourse because thats completely fair right? MH went mainstream & became a phenomenon on PSP but noooo.....we should compare MH3 to the PS2 MH's.....which were in fact released before MH went mainstream & became a phenomenon in Japan _____ What should we compare it too? MH4 whenever that comes out for now MH is like Pokemon in terms of sales. |
It is tons of fair. Would you compare Pokemon Battle Revolution to Pokemon Diamond? If you say no, I could do the same thing you are doing. "But Pokemon Battle revolution released AFTER it became popular on handhelds". Monster Hunter 3 has the same values as the other console games. The Handheld games deviate from these values. The Handheld games focus on local multiplayer, something much bigger in Japan than the Online Multiplayer that the Console games focus on. By the way Monster Hunter 2 came out 3 months before the Monster Hunter Freedom. That proves one thing. Monster Hunter became popular because of the PSP, not that of natural progression. That means the Monster Hunter Tri should be considered as a sequel to the consoles games rather than the PSP ones. That makes my comparison to the console version much MORE 'fair' and valid than comparing it to the PSP ones. Actually the trends between the two games speak for themselves. Monster Hunter 2 was much more frontloaded than freedom, proving that they target different values and therefore audiences. The audiences may overlap due to love fore the series, but they aren't 1:1 the same.







