KylieDog said:
hardyhar said:
Magnific0 said:
^Or you can give one new game to me, just the same price for a year of Live more or less, I don't mind. You'd rather eat a Mars bar each day, and I'd rather have 5 or 6 full-price games more than you when everything is said and done this gen. |
Paying for a superior service is not a problem for me, especially when it affects my experience with all of the games that I buy in a positive way. Your argument is like saying that I should have Freeview instead of paying for cable TV, then I could afford to buy more DVDs, but Freeview sucks compared to cable and I'll buy whatever DVDs I like anyway. If you can't afford to pay for Live and buy all of the games you want to buy, perhaps you need to look for more lucrative employment.
|
Do you even live in the real world? These fantasist scenarios do not make any solid point.
|
Fantasist scenarios? Hahaha. I pay for Live because it's better than PSN. I own a PS3 where I could be playing games for free, but I still choose to pay for Live and I use it loads more than PSN, which should tell you something. The argument that I could be buying 1 more game a year is irrelevant as I can afford to buy any games that I like. I'm not saying that to brag, but out in the real world where people have jobs and earn money, stuff like that really happens you know!
