By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
trestres said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
The gap was in the hopes third parties would fill it, which they did with the DS. So it's just as much the fault of third parties for not taking the obvious opportunity.

How do you know that? It could have been that they were relying too much on a couple of big hits instead of having a more constant release of games. Either ways it's their fault for relying on someone from the outside.

They did it with the DS. Did you miss what happened there? And don't tell me it's Nintendo's fault for "relying", when they had plenty of reason to think it would repeat with the Wii. The third parties chose not to take advantage of that. It's their fault for refusing to go with the system sooner.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs