Soundwave said:
Nintendo doesn't give two craps about anything that doesn't serve their bottom line. If they felt like they could make more money with a $500 machine for the core gamer with uber-violent games, they would totally do that. |
SW, you should probably not get your knowledge of BOS from intern forum threads. When you actually bother to read BOS then go on to make claims. Nintendo has pretty much adopted the principle of BOS. That doesn't mean they are prone to mistakes and much of your comments seem to indicate a lack of knowledge of the long term effects.
As for bolded part of the text. That's pretty much how BOS works. Find a market that makes money. Learning to reduce risk, over head and find that profitable bottom line. It doesn't mean that BOS isn't adaptable or fluctuating. ACtually after 100 years of business studies by the writers of BOS. THe only successful strategy is a changing strategy. So any moves by Nintendo is to continue on the idea of finding that profitable bottom line. Sometimes they will make mistakes sometimes they won't. The more evidence of lack of BOS is the PS3 launch where Sony went blindly into the market. Believing the same current high compitition enviroment is the most profitable.
So however you look at it they will follor the principles. It's just that understanding the principles are common sense in business. Though most businesses don't display it.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.







