Do any of the Halo games deserve the popularity and critical acclaim?

[Strategyking92]

uadfa said:

Strategyking92 said:
Yes.
Looking back on things, halo 2 doesn't. But at the time it was revolutionary in terms of console online multiplayer.
Halo 1 is definitely AAA material. Epic campaign, and good online eventually(PC version)
Halo 2 had a letdown campaign, but it kept me hooked on the series. No memorable events from the game though.
Halo 3 was jam packed to the gills with content. Forge, theater, a billion multiplayer modes, off-online co-op, campaign, achievements implemented probably the best up to that point, bungie fileshare, and other little things.

Halo 3 had the worst campaign though.

Hell to the fuck no. I may have beat it in a day (over the span of a 12-hour playthrough.) in normal, but that doesn't mean it wasn't entertaining. It looked good, ran good, and played good. You can't say the same for the 8-hour shitfest that was Halo 2. Halo 3 had alot more variety.

The fact that you dislike it doesn't mean it didn't have those things. You just grew old of the game series. Hell, I grow old of mario, sonic, and zelda.