Hardcore: Stop having fun! Games are supposed to be serious!

[theRepublic]

Khuutra said:

Alby_da_Wolf said:

Well PS2 could be defined disruptive as it widened the functions offered by a consoles.

About understanding Malstrom, wouldn't it help if he avoided using doom and gloom tones? And if he avoided implicitly implying destruction after disruption? Or pretending that each move of Wii's competitors is wrong? Disruption happened, it's undeniable, but what Malstrom writes can maybe describe the initial mind-boggling Wii success and the reactions to it, not how things evolved. Sony and MS were initially caught by surprise, but they both reacted, and about motion detection itself, it has already been experimented both on PS2 and PC, it's just that Wii was the first to have the right formula to make it really usable, enjoyable and appealing for the masses, but Sony and MS don't have to start from scratch to react to it too, it's more correct to say that they have to work on ergonomics of motion control, instead.

That isnt what "disruptive" means, either. Disruptive means that it undercuts traditional values in favor of new ones and thereby gains control of the market through channels that its competitors never considered. The PS2 was not disruptive. It was a logical progression of the PS1.

Khuutra took the first paragraph, I'll take the second.

The reason that Malstrom generally talks about doom and gloom for Sony and Microsoft is because of how the process of disruption works.  It is not a one time event (like the launch of the Wii).  Disruption involves a series of steps, starting with a low end innovative product, and slowly moving that product upstream to users who require more performance (the first steps seem to be the Balance Board and Motion Plus).  Historically, the disruptive product pushes incumbents out of the market.