Booth: PS3 misconceptions and spin

[Entroper]

LordTheNightKnight said:

fazz said:
Sorry but after he said "PS3 has a slower fillrate than 360" I stoped caring to what he had to say. Both with 8 Raster Operators and RSX being 50 mhz faster, that puts it ahead just a bit. Developers these days...

Clock speed and raster operators are only two measurements. especially since many of the maximum numbers on spec sheets are theoretical maximums. Basically it's actual gaming performance that dictates which has the best fill rate, so we can't see which is the best based on spec sheets.

I'm not claiming the RSX is weaker, just that the things you pointed doesn't refute his claim.

The thing is, the author of the article provided nothing at all to back up his claims.  He should be aware of the myriad of other technical comparison articles out there that do not come to the same conclusions -- merely stating "the PS3 has less fillrate" and "the Blu-ray drive is twice as slow" don't make them true.  At least fazz gave some reasoning.