oli2 said:
I am not sure you have understood what this economical strategy trully is. Nothing prevents Nintendo from disrupting itself. In fact, Malstrom predicts that Nintendo have to disrupt itself to survive the Wii ! |
The NES is, the Playstation isn't.
The NES made gaming simpler, and marketed towards underserved, "crummy" customers (children). The Atari era consoles may have already been going down the tubes, but they were still disrupted in the end.
The playstation on the other hand outcompeted in the market. It didn't make things simpler, or appeal to new customers. Instead the Playstation had a larger software library, more computational power, more capable of 3D etc. And in part they used their financial muscle to do this. by selling the consoles at a loss. The customers it sold to were mostly the NES era kids who were looking for gaming to grow up with them, ie. be something that's cool and 'mainstream'.
The playstation was attempting to disrupt the personal computer though.
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.







