Rath on 12 August 2009
| superchunk said: Man you guys are killing in trying to force the legal nitty gritty of lawyer definitions for everything. That is not what's at stake here. I know that *technically* its copyright infringement. I know the world's courts don't call it theft. In the end its the same thing under a different label. You are taking content (iso) of which you have no legal right to obtain. That is theft, plain and simple. So please quit with the off topic analogies to try to force a square into a round hole. |
You're trying to change the definition of theft to include things that are not thefts. Theft in the sense we are using it is a legal term as theft is a crime, what is considered theft by the law is what theft is.
