FayeC on 12 August 2009
| superchunk said: Man you guys are killing in trying to force the legal nitty gritty of lawyer definitions for everything. That is not what's at stake here. I know that *technically* its copyright infringement. I know the world's courts don't call it theft. In the end its the same thing under a different label. You are taking content (iso) of which you have no legal right to obtain. That is theft, plain and simple. So please quit with the off topic analogies to try to force a square into a round hole. |
You still don't get it. Thats not the case. They are refered to as two different things because thats simply what they are. Its been pointed out again and again. In one instance, some one is out something, in other instance no one is out anything. There is more than a legal snafu, its two different terms to decribe two different things.
