Crashdown77 on 12 August 2009
| superchunk said: @Crashdown, while I like your line of thinking, that is easily refuted as it actually directly affects and harms the original person's credit. Their argument is that copying the content does no harm. Either way both are theft as you're taking something you have no consent to have. |
Eh, you're probably right. Nonetheless, I think the analogy could be taken by someone with a greater legal mind than myself, and run with as part of their total argument package.
