| KylieDog said: If metacritic is your best defence I am laughing. Guess what, what IW thinks players want and what players actually do want are different things also. The co-op modes on WaW always have a crapload of people playing them...but of course all those people in fact dislike the co-op, they play it because they hate it. They have the evidence right there that people like it, R2 also had many complaints when it was removed. BUT IW KNOW BETTER. |
So why are CoD's 4 and 5 still played as much if WaW is so much better? (This week WaW 2nd on Live, last 4 2nd)
I'm using gamerankings because you won't listen to everyone else saying 4 is better, or all the critics saying 4 is better. Everyone will agree 4 had the better campaign, the pacing, level design and basically everything else was far better than WaW. Seriously, I don't know what you want me to say to convince you. Everyone else in this thread disagrees with you. I tried explaining why 4 is rated higher, but you ignored it so what do you want?
I'm not saying that co-op is bad, but the SP experience is worse because of it. WaW is more about large scale military conflicts, whereas for most of 4 you are working in small squads with the SAS, and so creating co-op modes seperate means that the SP can still be great
There's not much more I can say given that you ignore all my points.
